Kingdom Come Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202443336
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Memphis, TN, USA
Phone
9018702608
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$76,600
Expenses
$131,131
Assets
$25,002
Liabilities
$295,490

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • James Loy Beene Jr (Director / President)
  • Rob Johnson (Director / Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • James Loy Beene Jr (Director / President)
  • Rob Johnson (Director / Vice President)
  • Janice Johnson (Director / Secretary Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Love God first so we know how to live a sacrificial lifestyle loving people, recruiting indigent males to combat crime while working alongside people of various ethnicities to exterminate racism, while training and mentoring in Christian morals, responsibility, and work ethics, serving the community by distributing donated surplus food to other ministries and indigent communities. We also support other charitable and beneficial organizations.

What it reported doing in 2023

"Jesus Saves Shine in the Dark Men's Team" Work Ethics Training / Clients served: approximately 41. Mentoring and or housing of inner-city indigent males who are often fatherless, disabled, homeless, exiting incarceration, or of college age merely requiring a quiet refuge to study. The clients and or tenants are trained in various work ethics in preparation for entering into the work force. The income produced from the sale of inventory including evangelistic supplies (4c) prepared by these men helps them to gain independence by providing for their own needs including shelter, food, clothing, and continued education. The clients are also trained in business, leadership, financial responsibility, home economics, property maintenance, community service, Christian morals, and they're encouraged in scholastic achievements and continued education. Some that fail often return from their communities, the streets or imprisonment to recommit to the challenge.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -71.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 11.82; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $98K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.