King's Daughters Health Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611035701
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Ashland, KY, USA
Phone
6064080412
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$524,780
Expenses
$284,678
Assets
$4,913,613
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIM MCCANN (PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN)
  • LAURA PATRICK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAURA PATRICK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $150,447 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The king's daughters health foundation is an organization committed to improving the health and quality of life in our community. The health foundation supports king's daughters medical center (kdmc) in its mission to be the premier healthcare provider in the tri-state area. The health foundation also extends healthcare services in our community, promotes comprehensive health awareness through education, and provides scholarships for students entering healthcare-related fields.

What it reported doing in 2024

The king's daughters health foundation purpose is to increase philanthropic support of uk king's daughters by addressing and supporting the growing healthcare needs of the communities we serve. The foundation not only provides long term financial support for enhancing and sustaining the uk king's daughters mission, but also supports programs and initiatives that support health and wellbeing in the uk kd service areas. The foundation's board of directors is a network of business leaders, healthcare leaders, and community members working together to be good stewards of the funds received.the health foundation has helped to support the efforts of uk king's daughters through identifying special needs of patients, families and team members; outreach services including screenings; building and construction efforts to expand services; scholarships for high school students; mobile mammography and breast cancer services; aeds for our community and continued support of the oncology center for excellence. In fy25, the health foundation hosted its second dueling pianos fundraiser, continued the gifts of gratitude program, continued food trucks for bucks and continued to facilitate the rocky and leah adkins cure for cancer golf tournament. There were no new funds established during this timeframe.the health foundation coordinated two major fundraisers in 2025, the rocky and leah adkins cure for cancer golf tournament, which brought in $142,780 for oncology services and the killer dueling pianos which brought in $87,093 for the general fund.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 58
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.8%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 52.7%; rating input score 53; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.8%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.26; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 52.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.8% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $262K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 8 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.