King of Prussia Bridge Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
872485122
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
King of Prussia, PA, USA
Phone
6102322250
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$173,547
Expenses
$143,602
Assets
$85,849
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Dickenson (President)
  • Rex Saffer (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Mark Cohen (Club Manager)
  • Karen Pollak (Treasurer)
  • John Dickenson (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ownership and operation of a not-for-profit bridge club and bridge teaching program.

What it reported doing in 2024

During 2024, the KOPBC hosted 346 bridge games, with a total of 3188.5 tables in play. 587 unique players played at the club, many multiple times. The Club offered an extensive program of beginner and intermediate lessons. The Club runs weekly supervised sessions for new players and a game for beginning players combining duplicate bridge with lessons during the game.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 67.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 42.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $144K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.