Kindred Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371549891
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Kindred, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7014283177
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $309,832
- Expenses
- $160,117
- Assets
- $542,402
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROGER CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT)
- KERRI WHIPPLE (VICE PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- JAY HESSE (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TAMI HENKE (DIRECTOR)
- SARAH OUSE (TREASURER (LEFT 11/2025))
- ROGER CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
An organization of parents and community supporting, encouraging, and advancing the kindred athletic programs focusing on wholesome school spirit, promoting good sportsmanship, and developing high ideals of character.
What it reported doing in 2025
The kindred booster club was able to financially contribute to the new junior high football field project being done at the high school, and provide a financial commitment to the new track that was completed for the athletes of kindred. The booster club provided all financial responsibilities for two new ticket booths entering the new track area that also serves as the main footfield field. They also were able to financially help numerous teams during their state competitions by providing hospitality gathering rooms, state meals, and travel costs to take the burden off the students and parents. With not only helping the teams at the state level, the booster club has provided funding to each team and or organized student group with team/group building funds to better not only the athlete but the student who attends kindred public schools. They have also earmarked funds to be provided to the school for a new activity bus that is in the process of being built with the growing number of students who are being transported to various functions representing the kindred school district.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.8%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.39; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.8% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $155K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.