Kindbridge Research Institute

What it reported doing in 2023

Project 2: Colorado military problem gambling research, education and recovery program (co vets)co vets purpose: the purpose of this grant was to establish the following responsible and disordered gambling programs in the state of Colorado and to assist active military personnel and veterans: veterans recovery program (consisting of treatment, peer-support groups)co military research fellowshiprotc education and awareness programco vets evaluation: veterans recovery program (consisting of treatment, peer-support groups)the evaluation of the veterans recovery program, an initiative aimed at establishing responsible gambling programs for active military personnel and veterans in Colorado, has highlighted the program's effectiveness in providing critical support through treatment and peer-support groups. The project has successfully launched free virtual therapy sessions and facilitated the creation of peer support groups, which have become invaluable resources for active military members and their families dealing with gambling issues. Participants have reported a high level of satisfaction with the accessibility and quality of the therapy sessions, emphasizing the benefit of engaging with therapists who are attuned to the unique challenges faced by those in the military and veterans.co military research fellowshipas part of the program, two fellows were recruited in Colorado and underwent an intensive curriculum. This comprehensive training encompassed essential topics such as gambling disorder and military mental health. In addition to coursework, the fellows conducted research, the results of which were translated into informative posters. Their contributions were further showcased at the icrg conference in las vegas in october 2023, where they played an active role in presenting research findings from various projects led by kri.rotc education and awareness programour training sessions were led by a veteran who personally dealt with gambling disorder, ensuring first hand insights and empathy in our approach. These sessions were conducted both in-person and online to maximize accessibility. In-person training sessions were held across three universities, covering rotc and athlete populations, collectively reaching over 1100 students and 300 staff members. This dual delivery method ensured broad engagement and allowed for a comprehensive dissemination of essential knowledge and strategies.learning outcomes were evaluated with a short quiz on problem gambling knowledge before and after the training. All groups showed a significant improvement in their scores after the training. Their scores went up by around 0.75 to 1.5 points, which is considered statistically significant. We also asked 2 questions about the education session. Most people thought the program content matched their education and experience well, with around 89% to 95% saying they agreed or somewhat agreed. Similarly, almost everyone thought the presenter was knowledgeable in problem gambling, with about 95% to 100% agreeing or somewhat agreeing.co vets impact: veterans recovery program (consisting of treatment, peer-support groups)the peer support groups have fostered a sense of community and mutual understanding that is often crucial for recovery. These groups offer a platform for shared experiences and collective healing, reinforcing the therapeutic work done in individual sessions. The dual approach of professional treatment and peer-based support has shown to be effective in enhancing the well-being of participants, with many demonstrating marked improvements in their ability to manage gambling behaviors. The success of the veterans recovery program has also set a precedent within the state, underscoring the importance of targeted support for the military community in the realm of responsible gambling initiatives.co military research fellowshipthe co military research fellowship has had a significant impact on both the fellows. Through an intensive curriculu

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 70.8%; rating input score 71
• Program expense ratio: 68.4%; rating input score 68
• Fundraising efficiency: $26.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: Limited
• Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
• Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 17th percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Fail
  • Document-retention policy: Fail
  • CEO compensation review process: Fail
  • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.17; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 94.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 144.5% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 153% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings