Kind

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262763038
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2028248689
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Legal Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,971,038
Expenses
$79,556,234
Assets
$59,315,542
Liabilities
$25,282,447

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WENDY ALICE YOUNG (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • WENDY ALICE YOUNG (PRESIDENT): $629,632 total reported compensation
  • HAYFORD NARH MENSAH (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $397,813 total reported compensation
  • MARIA MATEO ODOM (SVP, GLOBAL LEGAL): $387,274 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We envision a world in which children’s rights and well-being are protected as they migrate alone in search of safety. We will achieve our vision by: Ensuring that no child appears in immigration court without high quality legal representation; Advancing laws, policies, and practices that ensure children’s protection and uphold their right to due process and fundamental fairness; and Promoting in countries of origin, transit, and destination durable solutions to child migration that are grounded in the best interests of the child and ensure that no child is forced to involuntarily migrate.

What it reported doing in 2024

Kind is working in and outside of the u.s. Toward a world where we share, across borders and continents, an absolute commitment to the protection of children from persecution, trafficking, and other harms. In complement to kind's domestic legal programs and advocacy work, kind's international work enables it to contribute to unaccompanied children's rights, protection, and well-being in their home countries and as they migrate in search of safety. Kind's steadfast commitment to providing legal representation to unaccompanied children everywhere we work, our programming in central america to address the root causes of migration, and our work in mexico and europe to improve the treatment of children on the move and children seeking permanency, deepen our ties to the worldwide community that supports the protection of unaccompanied children. Our work increasing the capacity of government actors and agencies to strengthen child protection systems is vital to our efforts.work in central america/mexico kind works to increase access to protection and rights for migrant children throughout the central america-mexico region. Kind has four regional initiatives that aim to address the root causes of migration, educate the public about child migration in the region, reunify separated families, and ensure access to information and protection for migrant children. Kind's initiatives include:(1) central american child return and reintegration projectkind's central american child return and reintegration project provides comprehensive support to migrant children repatriated to guatemala and honduras to address their range of needs and support their safe reintegration into their families and communities. Kind provides pre-departure coordination to ensure that children are not returning to dangerous situations, to identify reintegration needs, and to prepare children and families with information on the return process. Kind then works with local partner organizations in guatemala and honduras to provide holistic support for children and their families, including psychosocial support and assistance with accessing education, medical, and mental health services, as well as identifying opportunities for skills building, job training, and internships for older youth. This support allows children and their families to access opportunities within their communities and provides alternatives to re-migration. In 2024, kind provided reintegration services to 350 returned children, along with their families, serving a total of approximately 1100 individuals, and connecting them to vital services including mental health, medical care, education, and basic needs. Kind engages with the u.s. And central american governments to improve the repatriation process to ensure it is child friendly. Kind also advocates for increased u.s. Foreign assistance and investment from central american countries to address the root causes of child migration from the region and to expand services available for returning unaccompanied migrant children and their families.(2) gender and migration initiativekind's gender and migration initiative uses research, advocacy, and programming to prevent and address gender-based violence, a leading cause of forced child migration from central america. Kind works with local partner organizations in guatemala and honduras to engage children and youth, teachers, parents and caregivers, and community members in violence prevention programming. Programming responds to the specific needs of local communities and includes school-based prevention workshops for secondary school students, leadership and economic empowerment programming for adolescent girls, and sexual abuse prevention workshops for teachers. In 2024, kind and partner organizations engaged 980 individuals in guatemala and honduras in gender-based violence prevention efforts.kind also works with organizations and experts in central america and mexico to gather up-to-date information on

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 79% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 72
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.2%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Pass
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 48.6%; rating input score 49; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 7 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 81.2% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $64.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $630K · 29 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $798K reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 42 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 49/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.