Kin-dom Community
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331812364
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5129401728
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $162,262
- Expenses
- $159,065
- Assets
- $6,572
- Liabilities
- $33,235
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN LEEDY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ADAM GOLDEN (PRESIDENT)
- MORGAN DARLING (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN LEEDY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ADAM GOLDEN (PRESIDENT)
- MORGAN DARLING (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing safe worship venues and events, religious educational and worship camps for lgbtqia+ community members and others who have felt cast out by or uncomfortable in "traditional" churches by offering environments of spiritual inclusion and young adult leadership training.
What it reported doing in 2025
Camp - kindom camp is a weeklong, residential summer camp for special needs teenagers. Last year we had 55 campers enrolled in our program. At our camp we offer a number of traditional summer camp activities as well as providing specialized care to these young people, many of whom have mental health concerns. Camp is a place where they can find a safe place to connect, celebrate who they are, engage resources and support groups, and deepen their relationship with the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.4%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 61.6%; rating input score 62
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 5.06; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.1%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -83.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.4% of revenue deployed · 61.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $98K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.