Kimmswick Historical Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431148005
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Kimmswick, MO, USA
- Phone
- 6364640221
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,085
- Expenses
- $46,050
- Assets
- $454,259
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LILLIAN D NAGY (PRESIDENT)
- ELIZABETH HAGAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LILLIAN D NAGY (PRESIDENT)
- DIANE NAES (SECRETARY)
- ELIZABETH HAGAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of this organization shall be: "educational and "scientific" within the meaning of sec. 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. In furtherance of these purposes, the corporation shall develop a planned program of educational & scientific study, protection, preservation, restoration & interpretation of sites & objects significant to our local, state & national culture; encourage & stimulate private owners to appreciate their historic treasures & help them to preserve & restore these important features of our historic heritage; collect & preserve in safe-keeping any & all articles & data of historical interest connected specifically with the town of kimmswick; encourage the protection & preservation of historical sites; encourage appreciation of our historic heritage by educational programs; encourage historical research relevant to the early settlers of the town of kimmswick; provide assistance & consultation in governmental agencies in historic conservation.
What it reported doing in 2025
Through drawing crowds to the annual apple butter festival to educate people about the historical significance of the town of kimmswick and its preservation
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.86; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.