Killarney Farms Swim Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941549332
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Santa Clara, CA, USA
Phone
4082413609
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Swimming & Other Water Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$93,860
Expenses
$61,978
Assets
$65,832
Liabilities
$5,169

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH NAIR (President)
  • MARY RYDEEN (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETH NAIR (President)
  • MARY RYDEEN (Vice President)
  • JULIE WINTER (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Killarney farms swim center, inc. Provides services, including recreational and competitive swim activities to the community.

What it reported doing in 2017

Killarney farms swim center, inc. Is a non-profit corporation composed of dues paying families who enjoy the use of its facilities. The organization provides many services to its member families, including swim lessons and swim team. The focus is on stroke technique, endurance, speed, effort and sportsmanship.swim lessons are avaialble for members and non-members focusing on the teachings of stroke mechanics, as well as water safety. There are various levels of class offerings via both private and group lessons.the organization has supported a competitive swim team since the early 1960's that is available to both members and non-members ages 4-18 who pass a basic water safety test. Efforts are made to place all qualified teammates regardless of their natural ability.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 34%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.