Kilauea School PTSA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990293250
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Kilauea, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8088281212
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $135,304
- Expenses
- $97,229
- Assets
- $121,988
- Liabilities
- $3,282
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lea Weldon (President)
- Tania Larkin (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Lea Weldon (President)
- Tania Larkin (Vice President)
- Nanea Sproat-Armitage (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Kilauea School PTSA is dedicated to supporting and enriching student experiences at Kilauea School through the generosity of our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Specials Teacher Position (Art/Music, PE), Afterschool Clubs, Buses for Field Trips, Classroom/Teacher Support. 300 Students received Art/Music & P.E. instruction one hour, once a week for 40 weeks. Two sessions of Afterschool clubs were held for a total of 21 weeks servicing 175 kids 1-2x/week. PTSA paid for 28 field trips for classroom teachers serving 300 kids throughout the school year. PTSA also provided teacher support for classroom teachers reimbursing them for supplies purchased.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.5%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.1%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.5% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.