Kidsmatter Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364448507
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Naperville, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3312496831
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $864,864
- Expenses
- $618,694
- Assets
- $725,950
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RYAN LAUTERWASSER (PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN STERRETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NINA MENIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- NINA MENIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $127,500 total reported compensation
- SHERILYN HEBEL (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $44,200 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Building resilient kids who say no to destructive choices and yes to endless possibilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Career pathways: partnering with the naperville school districts 203 and 204-developed an authentic workplace learning college and career readiness program, springboard series, for high school junior and seniors to expose them to careers in healthcare and trades & construction during the summer of 2024. This program helps students develop employable skills and readies them for either college or a careers in healthcare or trades & construction. We also added elmhurst school district 205.developed a program to provide youth mental health first aid training in dupage and will counties in partnership with linden oaks behavioral health. Also, supported a program to teach juniors and seniors about philanthropy and leadership development.collaborative youth team: leading the coalition of 35 youth-serving non-profit agencies in dupage and will counties, kidsmatter works with these organizations to promote and advocate for the health and well-being of kids and families. This year we distributed stress relief care packages to youth and families through out dupage & will counties. We also launched a kindness campaign.provided a variety of community events for youth and families including a job fair, volunteer fair, games around the world, youth service awards, and a student leadership academy.the crisis text line was launched as an outcome of the stress management survey. The line has received 2,560 conversations and has produced 31 active saves since its launch. The line is for anyone who is in crisis. It provides a trained counselor, at the end of the line, who is ready to listen, without you even speaking by texting ""reach"" to 741 741 from anywhere in the us.held educational forums both virtual and in person on topics that are relevant in our community including: mental health and suicide prevention, resilience, stress management and vaping, substance abuse and addiction. These forums are conducted in schools, the faith-based communities and within non-profit organizations in the area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.8%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28.5%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.8% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $485K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.