Kids 'N Kamp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311052278
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
Phone
6142622220
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Camps

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,499
Expenses
$102,461
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC STOLLER (PRESIDENT)
  • FELICIA BARLOW (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • BEVERLY CIRCONE (SECRETARY): $27,577 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

When a child with cancer struggles with the physical and emotional pain a diagnosis can bring, the entire family is affected as well. Kids 'n kamp offers programs to every family member, cancer patients, parents and sibling alike.

What it reported doing in 2020

Knk offers various programs including a mom's night out, mom's quilting weekend, mom's retreat, dad's night out, valentines day party and a pumpkin hunt and hayride to relax, connect with other families who have been affected by cancer and maintain these relationships.dinner on "12" at children's hospital - the premise of this program is simple: deliver good eats and happy smiles to the one place both are most hard to come by - the cancer unit of nationwide children's hospital. The monthly event is hosted by kids "n kamp and is sponsored by papa john's pizza and provides the same type of pizza party experience in the hospital that kids on the outside know and love. Each child can choose a special toy or dvd from "michelles magical toy cart."hugs-is a program for families who have lost their children to cancer. The program is designed to give the grieving family time together in an enjoyable fun-filled atmosphere.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 59
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -146.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $28K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.