Kidney & Urology Foundation of America Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
131777413
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Staten Island, NY, USA
Phone
7183517040
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Kidney Disease

Reported finances

Revenue
$150,249
Expenses
$337,742
Assets
$91,206
Liabilities
$41,332

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAM GIARRUSSO (PRESIDENT)
  • PALMINA FAVA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT GENUARIO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SAM GIARRUSSO (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN COVELLI (VICE PRES.)
  • PALMINA FAVA (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The kidney & urology foundation of america (kufa) is dedicated to developing and supporting programs that that improve the lives of those suffering from kidney and urologic diseases those awaiting transplants

What it reported doing in 2019

Kufa offers the renal and transplant populations opportunityto improve their lives through college and rehabilitationsscholarships , summer campership for pediatric dialysis and transplant, patient emergency grants

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 5%; rating input score 5
  • Program expense ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -124.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 5% of revenue deployed · 2.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.