Kick for Nick Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
743255044
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Danbury, CT, USA
Phone
2032167134
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Cultural Exchange

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,138
Expenses
$13,382
Assets
$63,000
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHALINI MADARAS (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • WILLIAM MADARAS (VICE-PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • SHALINI MADARAS (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • WILLIAM MADARAS (VICE-PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • MARIE MADARAS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which nonstock corporations may be formed under Connecticut law including, but not limited to, (1) the collection and donation of soccer balls for children in iraq, afghanistan, and any location where there may be american troops, in honor of pfc. Nicholas a. Madaras, (2) support for applied behavioral rehabilitation institute, inc., ("abri") and most specifically its programs entitled homes for the brave and the pfc. Nicholas a. Madaras home, so long as abri qualifes as an organization exempt from tax under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code and other like programs, but in all events not for any purpose not permitted of an organization that is exempt from taxation, (3) the distribution of soccer balls and soccer equipment to children in other locations where the need is great and the equipment is appreciated, all in honor of pfc. Nicholas a. Madaras.

What it reported doing in 2025

Distributed soccer balls throughout the world to children in need. (the balls were, for the most part, donated anonymously.) also a considerable amount of youth and adult soccer equipment and clothing was so distributed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.71; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.