Khumbula Thina Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550740397
IRS 990-PF coverage
2014–2017
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2017
Location
Great Cacapon, WV, USA
Rating
20
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Preservation, Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,681
Expenses
$60,169

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Wildlife Preservation, Protection

What it reported funding in 2017

The foundation reported 1 grant totaling $23,000. The stated grant purpose was wildlife protection.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from contributions.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.

The verdict

REVIEW - The strongest available result is that the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants and assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
  • Cost Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency: NotEnoughData
  • Compliance: 50
  • Endowment Health: 26

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: Limited

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 38.2%; rating input score 38; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Limited

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: Limited
  • Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 0.23; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: Filed grants detail
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Investments: 26th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 26/100.