Khmer Alliance Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680184425
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Kelso, WA, USA
Phone
3606363989
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$620
Expenses
$370
Assets
$773

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL C MARITH (President)

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL C MARITH (President)
  • THACH EL (Treasurer)
  • BONJ HOY (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose of this Organization is to provide assistance to Cambodianpeople in need, to provide technical assistance to organizations serving thecambodian people, and to educate the general public about the situations in Cambodia and their relationship to the international community.

What it reported doing in 2022

KAF Program/Projects are to contribute to the improvement of life of the village people in the remote areas. They are projects that address community developmentneeds.Projects such as irrigation systems and water ponds are helping with water needs for the livelihood and crops. School is for village children that enhance education.A new KAF Project called California-Cambodian American On the Move(CACROM) is a research to document how the Cambodian Refugees in the State of California were doing in the first 20 years since they first arrived.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 16.1%; rating input score 16
  • Program expense ratio: 27%; rating input score 27

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.3%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.09; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -20.2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 16.1% of revenue deployed · 27% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 16/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.