Keystone Pet-enhanced Therapy Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
542098286
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Akron, PA, USA
Phone
8886857387
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,181
Expenses
$108,647
Assets
$91,299
Liabilities
$266

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ERIKA WILKINSON (BOARD CHAIR)
  • TOM BURGUM (DIRECTOR)
  • LORI ROSCOE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Kpets provides a network of dependable registered pet therapy teams whose passion is touching lives and warming hearts by providing comfort, encouragement, and rehabilitation through human/animal interaction.

What it reported doing in 2024

Promotion of animal assisted therapy and activities by recruiting, educating, and coordinating volunteers with the facilities, social agencies, and special needs programs whose clients may benefit from the healing and rehabilitating effects of the human/animal bond. The unconditional love of our pets is shared with those of all ages and walks of life. Those served by our specially trained volunteers and pets include special-needs children and adults, adults in retirement facilities, hospital patients, and other organizations that request our volunteers and their pers. Persons benefitting varies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.6%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 53.9%; rating input score 54

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.6% of revenue deployed · 53.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.