Kewaskum Community Pantry UA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462065335
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Kewaskum, WI, USA
Phone
2623343120
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Centers
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,034
Expenses
$26,310
Assets
$74,763

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Gina Raether (President)
  • Luke Piwoni (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Gina Raether (President)
  • Luke Piwoni (Vice President)
  • Daniel Kudex (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Kewaskum Community Pantry was created to provide immediate relief to those in need in the Kewaskum School District area. The pantry will be distributed based on family size. Each person who is in need may use the pantry 1 time per week. In order to qualify for food the patron must present a photo ID and either reside in the Kewaskum School District or belong to one the churches in Kewaskum School District. The Kewaskum Community Pantry currently offers food and clothing to individuals that are in need and plans to continue to so in the future. The pantry receives donations from local churches, individuals and other organizations. The goal of the pantry is to provide assistance for all people that need it in the Kewaskum Community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Distribute food and clothing to the Kewaskum School District area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.4%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.8%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.84; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.4% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.