Keuka College
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 166054295
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Keuka Park, NY, USA
- Phone
- 315-279-5262
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Undergraduate College (4-year)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $58,465,749
- Expenses
- $56,900,396
- Assets
- $67,693,210
- Liabilities
- $25,442,926
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY STOREY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- AMY STOREY (PRESIDENT): $412,691 total reported compensation
- HEATHER MALDONADO (INT PROVOST & VP ACADEMIC AFFAIRS): $231,348 total reported compensation
- PETE BEKISZ (VP ENROLLMENT MGMT & MKTG): $213,387 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Since our founding, Keuka College has been committed to creating exemplary citizens and leaders to serve the nation and the world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Since its founding in 1890 as a spiritually centered college of liberal arts and practical learning, keuka college has graduated generations of humanists and scientists, contributive citizens and caring leaders; women and men energetically engaged in the art of leading productive and fulfilling lives. Keuka college students are chosen for reasons of ability and character, and during their keuka college years, they develop those abilities, discover others they did not know they had, and take responsibility not only of the course of their educations, but the pursuit of their own happiness.keuka college offers accredited liberal arts-based undergraduate and graduate degree programs at its home campus and across New York state. The college also operates programs in china and vietnam. Nursing, business, criminal justice, social work, occupational therapy, psychology, and biology are among the top programs in the college's program portfolio.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 93
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $45.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $413K · 29 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.9M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.