Kern County Prosecutors Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770340605
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Bakersfield, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6613229420
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,304
- Expenses
- $47,960
- Assets
- $223,119
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH MARCANO (President)
- RICHARD CHOI (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JOSEPH MARCANO (President)
- RICHARD CHOI (Vice President)
- BRANDON STALLINGS (SEC/TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1. To encourage the practice of law in the field of criminal prosecution as a profession;2. To promote and advance professional competency in the practice of criminal prosecution;3. To promote ethical principles and practices for prosecutors;4. To advance the interests of prosecuting attorneys employed by the office of the District Attorney of Kern County and promote their economic well-being;5. To represent prosecuting attorneys who are employed by the County of Kern in the office of the District Attorney in their employment relations with the County of Kern; and6. To promote the full communication and improve relations between the County of Kern and the prosecuting attorneys employed in the office of the District Attorney of Kern County.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Association provides support and sponsors training sessions for its members. It also keeps members informed of legislation affecting their profession.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.65; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.