Kern Child Abuse Prevention Council Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953434566
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Bakersfield, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6616199353
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $716,025
- Expenses
- $722,672
- Assets
- $16,693
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The goal of the organization is stop child abuse in all forms by assistance with education and counseling to parents and their families. Services provided include teen crisis intervention, counseling, and teaching of behavioral and parenting skills to provide healing for families, so that the family becomes safe and loving for children.
What it reported doing in 2012
Funding was received to begin assistence program to low income clients regarding financial assistence. This funding was for the following three assistence programs DHS Emergency Fund, Time Flies Emergency Fund, and KSSP Emergency Fund. Funding for these programs was 41,133 to DHS Emergency Fund, 5,590 to Time Flie Emergency Fund, and 161 to KSSP Emergency Fund. Total payout on this new program was 46,884..
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 90% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $636K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.