Keri Anne Demott Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814288688
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Drunk Driving Related

Reported finances

Revenue
$117,181
Expenses
$80,669
Assets
$83,002
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Casey DeMott (President)

People named in this filing

  • William DeMott (Secretary)
  • Casey DeMott (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Part 1 We give education scholarships out during the year to youth who apply Automobile Expenses Auto Insurance 391027 Fuel 185664 Parking Tolls 58426 Repairs Maintenance 298296 Total Automobile Expenses 933413 Other Expenses Advertising Marketing 322574 Bank Charges Fees 43820 Charitable Donations 18744 Cleaning of Linens 32548 Dues Subscriptions 76302 Event Fees 1331875 Event Supplies 326066 Business Insurance 142309 Meals with Clients Travel 49097 Event Catering 416450 Total Meals Travel 465547 Office Supplies Software 317853 Taxes Licenses 13625 Training Certifications 103000 Travel 374476 Trophies Awards 147868 Victims Services Supplies 115885 Youth Board Event Fees 36463 Part 224 Purchased a company vehicle this year for 19280

What it reported doing in 2025

0

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.2%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 62.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 56.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.