Kenya Orphanage Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300141928
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Rock Hill, SC, USA
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Relief
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,135
- Expenses
- $152,492
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MONIQUE G BOEKHOUT (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES YODER (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MONIQUE G BOEKHOUT (PRESIDENT)
- DR ALAN D HARTLEY (SECRETARY)
- NANCY ROBERTS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The kenya orphanage project supports orphans in boarding schools in nairobi, kenya. In 2019 more than 30 children were supported. The AIDS epidemic and tribal warfare killed both parents of many kenyan children. Kop saw the need to help the many homeless children living in squalor in the kenyan slums. Kop and friends of the kenya orphanage project will support the children in the following ways: - through primary, secondary and college education, to expand the possibilities for a brighter future. - through research and overseeing of quality, cost effective and safe boarding schools. - through transparent and fiscally sound practices.
What it reported doing in 2019
Support house of hope which houses and educates many of the children supported by kenya orphanage project. Support provides for new uniforms, field trips, medical clinic and other expenses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -978.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $146K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.