Kenya Christian Education Partnership
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273761200
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Ambridge, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4127792900
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,702
- Expenses
- $134,928
- Assets
- $93,710
- Liabilities
- $53,647
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- JANE RICE (BOARD MEMBER)
- JANET HELMS (CHAIR)
- JOHN MACDONALD (VICE-CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission: kenya christian education partnership partners to build, operate, and sustain exemplary private schools in northern kenya that support a christian worldview with a commitment to generational betterment. Vision: to create an unprecedented environment of hope, opportunity, and advancement.
What it reported doing in 2017
To build schools and provide support for its students and staff in northern kenya. This is accomplished through raising funds to build classrooms and supporting buildings and to fill these buildings with the necessary furnishings. The student sponsorship program pays for sponsored students' tuition, uniforms, books, and lunch. The teacher sponsorship program underwrites annual teachers' salaries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $120K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.