Kentucky Waterways Alliance Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611239766
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
Phone
5025898008
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,888,426
Expenses
$2,674,224
Assets
$6,745,027
Liabilities
$231,816

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARTIN HJALM (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL WASHBURN (EXECUTIVE DI): $101,324 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To protect, restore and celebrate Kentucky's unique waterways and watersheds.

What it reported doing in 2025

Watershed program - restore kwa's watershed program includes a broad range of initiatives focused on reducing nonpoint source pollution and strengthening local watershed stewardship. Through its septic assistance program, kwa provides installation and repair services to low-income families, replacing failing systems that threaten water quality in areas such as the red river gorge. This work is funded in part through epa 319 grants. The watershed seed grant program provides up to 4,000 in project-based funding to small nonprofits and community groups addressing nonpoint source pollution issues across all seven of Kentucky's major river basins. Kwa also facilitates peer support and learning through the Kentucky watershed network, which brings together watershed leaders statewide. Locally, the red river festival combines community education, outdoor recreation, stream cleanups, and live music to celebrate and protect the watershed. The festival is a key recipient of recent Kentucky river authority grants. While it is difficult to estimate the total number of individuals impacted by this work, the benefits extend beyond direct participants. For every family that receives a septic system installation, the surrounding community and downstream communities benefit from reduced water contamination. In fy25, kwa funded seven seed grant projects across the state, each led by organizations with deep community ties. Three hundred people attended the red river festival. Kwa also piloted the green river access and tire identification project, which allows users statewide to scan a qr code and mark the location of waste tires in waterways. The program also includes the Kentucky aquatic resource fund (karf), a collaborative conservation initiative launched in 2009 by kwa in partnership with the u.s. Fish & wildlife service's Kentucky field office. Managed by kwa as the fund's financial steward, karf pools resources from multiple agencies and stakeholders to support research, surveys, waterway monitoring, stream and riparian habitat restoration, dam and barrier removal, threatened species propagation and reintroduction, voluntary land-preservation agreements, and matching funds for grant-driven conservation projects. In fy25, karf supported tangible improvements in Kentucky's waterways, including removal of the pineville dam on the cumberland river.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 63% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $77.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -41.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.52; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 13 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.