Kentucky Tennessee Red Angus Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455178037
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Henderson, KY, USA
- Phone
- 6063053663
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Farm Bureau, Grange
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,490
- Expenses
- $2,029
- Assets
- $7,148
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- WILL BANKS (CO-CHAIRMAN)
- BRETT FLACH (CO-CHAIRMAN)
- KARA CUNDIFF PRATHER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Kentucky Tennessee red angus association, inc. Was organized to provide its members and their customers with innovative programs and services to continue advancing the quality, reliability and value of the red angus breed of beef cattle used in the commercial beef industry. The organization is to foster and develop the breeding and marketing of red angus beef cattle through the participation in research programs, providing education programs to its members on breeding, marketing, herd management, to maintain pedigree and breeding perfomrance information, to promote the red angus breed of beef cattle to both producers and consumers.
What it reported doing in 2025
Youth programs - the funding of the junior red angus program
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 53.7%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -36.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.52; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -18.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -18.2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 53.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.