Kentucky Easter Seal Society Inc Dba Easterseals Bluegrass
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 610444712
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2021
- Location
- Lexington, KY, USA
- Phone
- 8593996270
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Rehabilitative Medical Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,906,582
- Expenses
- $8,949,818
- Assets
- $105,256,139
- Liabilities
- $19,202,161
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMIE ELLIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- RONALD HAGER (FACILITIES DIRECTOR): $161,470 total reported compensation
- JAMIE ELLIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $142,230 total reported compensation
- MARY J WHITE (FOOD SERVICES DIRECTOR): $114,744 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Kess dba easter seals cardinal hill is driven by a tireless passion to champion people of all ages, ensuring that everyone, regardless of ability or life challenge, has the ability to live, learn, work and play in our communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Kess dba easter seals cardinal hill's (kess) programs include an adult day health program, which provides daily programming and activities, community outreach, nutritious meals, and medical care by licensed nursing staff for adults from age 18 and up with a variety of diagnosis. Our clients could not safely stay alone, and our programs allow caregivers to pursue a career or care for other family members. Some of kess' activities include miracle league baseball, a trip to the movies, gardening, or a shopping trip to practice money management skills, that allow them to interact with peers, learn, enjoy friendships, and have the opportunity to exercise.see schedule o for a detailed continuation of program service accomplishments. Kess' adaptive recreation program brings adaptive kayaking, adaptive skiing, wheelchair basketball, adaptive gardening, sled hockey, and other activities to the community to allow individuals with disabilities to live a more fulfilling life. Our staff also go into the school systems to help both children with disabilities and without get a better appreciation for the recreational opportunities for the disabled population, and encourage greater participation.creative beginnings child development center provides inclusive child care for children from 6 weeks to kindergarten. Our teaching methods give attention to the needs and differences of each individual child enrolled. We strive for a blend of roughly 25% children with special needs. The desired percentage mirrors the community, that is what makes it a "natural environment" for learning. There are many advantages to inclusive settings of children with or without special needs as they learn from their typical peers. This also fosters understanding in the typically developing child. Furthermore, this model is helpful for families who have a child with special needs and a typically developing child so they are only working with one facility.summer program for children with special needs - includes camp creative, a summer day care extension of the childcare program to serve elementary school-aged children with special needs; and horseability, a program partnering with central Kentucky riding for hope, which offers day care and programs, including horses and horseback riding for children from kindergarten through high school, with both physical and developmental special needs.pediatric therapy - providing occupational therapy, physical therapy, and speech therapy for children of all ages from infancy through adolescence, this program addresses cognitive, physical, communication and developmental needs of each child. The therapists work collaboratively with the child's family support system, medical team, educational team and other support systems as needed to ensure a well-rounded program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.76; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 79.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $161K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.