Kentucky Commission on Women Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061657949
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Frankfort, KY, USA
- Phone
- 5025642611
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,520
- Expenses
- $1,112
- Assets
- $17,570
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cordelia Harbut (President)
People named in this filing
- Cordelia Harbut (President)
- Danette Wilder (Chairman)
- Nancy Atkinson (Board member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization was formed to support the charitable endeavors of the Kentucky Commission on Women, a governmental unit enabled by KRS 344.510-344.530. These include promoting, encouraging and providing advisory assistance in the establishment of local volunteer community improvement programs for, and of the interest to women; conducting programs, seminars, studies and conferences and encourage state and local women's business, professional and civic organizations to do likewise, to educate the public to the problems of women; consult with and advise the Governor and the agencies, departments, boards and commissions of the state and local and municipal government on matters pertaining to women; cooperate with the federal government and with the government of other states in programs relating to women.
What it reported doing in 2016
The Kentucky Commission on Women organizes annual events that promote, encourage, and honor women around the Commonwealth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 7
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.3%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 13
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 75.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.8; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -197.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 178.2% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.3% of revenue deployed · 13.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $149 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.