Kenosha Education Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391089325
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kenosha, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2626542127
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $350,766
- Expenses
- $446,718
- Assets
- $459,972
- Liabilities
- $76,916
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHERINE ANDRYSIAK-MONTEMURRO (PRESIDENT)
- ANNA PICARD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KENDRA KOEPPEN-MULWANA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KENDRA KOEPPEN-MULWANA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $121,118 total reported compensation
- KATHERINE ANDRYSIAK-MONTEMURRO (PRESIDENT): $28,105 total reported compensation
- MELISSA CHACON-HANSLER (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $8,190 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advocate respect and support for quality public education for all students and also promote professional and personal growth and economic welfare for our public school teachers and support professionals.
What it reported doing in 2024
'the purposes of this organization shall be: to aid and assist members in obtaining and extending benefits of mutual assistance and collective bargaining; to develop among the profession and the public a better understanding of the issues and problems in the area of educators' rights; to advance the civil and academic rights of those in the educational field; to encourage all members, without regard to age, race, creed, color, gender, sexual orientation, gender identification, marital status, disability, ethnicity, immigration status, national origin, ancestry, occupation, and religion, to share equally in the full benefits of this organization, the Wisconsin education association council, and the national education association; to work for legislation which will safeguard and promote the principle of free collective bargaining and the rights of those working in the education field and to oppose legislation contradictory to these objectives; to promote and use all appropriate media to advance and promote the education profession and the individual rights of the members of the education profession through education and other lawful means; to safeguard the democratic character of the association for protection of the rights of the education profession and its individual members through the organization of this association and the organizations with which it affiliates; to provide for involvement of minority members in association activities; to encourage members to register and vote and to exercise their full rights and responsibilities of citizenship and to perform their rightful part in the political life of local, state, and national communities while preserving the independence of our members and the education profession from political control; to engage in political activity permitted to a labor organization by law in furtherance of the objectives set forth in this article; to promote the human and civil rights and education welfare of all students; to promote the improvement of instruction; to work towards the improvement of member education and professional development; to develop and promote the adoption of such ethical practices, personnel policies, and standards of preparation and participation as mark a profession; to unify and strengthen the education profession and to secure and maintain the salaries, retirement, tenure, professional and sick leave, and other working conditions necessary to support those who work in the education field; to enable members to speak with a common voice on matters pertaining to the education profession and to present their individual and common interests before the board of education and other legal authorities; to hold property and funds and to employ a staff for the attainment of these purposes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 50
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 70%; rating input score 70; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 7 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.