Kelseys House Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921869255
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Waterford, MI, USA
Phone
5712266489
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Temporary Housing

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,732
Expenses
$73,559
Assets
$1,470
Liabilities
$12,916

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Hillary Pulliam (President)
  • Zachary Pulliam (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Hillary Pulliam (President)
  • Zachary Pulliam (Vice President)
  • Leslie Henstock (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Kelsey's House Foundation the Nonprofit was formed for the charitable purposes of providing a temporary shared community and transitional or permanent residential housing accommodations for individuals who are 1 living in a drug and alcohol-free environment, 2 experiencing mental health issues, 3 receiving medication-assisted treatment, or 4 experiencing housing insecurities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Nonprofit has focused on operating a recovery residence for individuals recovering from addictions. These individuals struggle with daily triggers, temptations and cravings. While getting sober is a huge step, staying sober can be difficult. For those who relapse, they may be kicked out of temporary housing - even for any minor indiscretions, including taking prescription medication. The Nonprofit, however, will provide recovery residence that is a sober, safe and healthy living environment, free from alcohol and illicit drug use and centered on peer support and connection to services that promote sustained recovery including: continued sobriety, improved individual health, residential stability, and positive community involvement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 8.79; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 50.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 46.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -149.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $111K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.