The Keith Dawson Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831861294
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Darby, PA, USA
Phone
(610) 809-9790
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$199,553
Expenses
$99,192
Assets
$34,359

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Miriam Hilliard (President)

People named in this filing

  • Miriam Hilliard (President)
  • Keith Hilliard Dawson (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support those affected by Leukemia, Lymphoma raise awareness and promote a healthier lifestyle.

What it reported doing in 2025

Holiday Bag Program - Provide Holiday Bags annually to Hospital Community Partner/Partners Blood Cancer Units for hospitalized Blood Cancer Patients facing the New Year with a Cancer diagnosis. These bags include, (but not limited to) warm socks, and/or slippers, warm hats, adult coloring books, colored pencils, pens/pencils, and sharpener, sensitive skin lotion, lip balm, puzzle books, card/letter, head wrap/scarves/turbans, and other mental well being activities, lemon ginger candy/lemon ginger tea.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.4%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 68.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $137K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 6 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.