Keeshond Club of America Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932451823
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Winston Salem, NC, USA
Phone
3368171079
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal-Related N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,185
Expenses
$6,060
Assets
$141,293
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Robert L Fowler (President)
  • Rick Su (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Anita Williams (Treasurer)
  • Robert L Fowler (President)
  • Michelle Roybal (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

- to improve the health of purebred Keeshonden by providing funding for scientific, clinical research and education for the fancy and the veterinary community - to aid the KCA in its mission to encourage and expand the responsible breeding of quality, purebred Keeshonden - to provide resources to help the KCA teach and help implement best practices for selection and breeding with both new and existing Keeshond breeders - to help today's breeders preserve the genetic heritage of the Keeshond and ensure that it will be accessible to future generations of responsible breeders of purebred Keeshonden - to provide assistance in exigent circumstances for Keeshonden and KCA members - to lend support to the KCA's efforts to expand public awareness and appreciation for the Keeshond

What it reported doing in 2025

Purchased and distributed genetic tests and paid for shipping to the lab.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.1%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 58.4%; rating input score 58

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.32; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -183.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.1% of revenue deployed · 58.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.