Keepers of the Flame Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882951279
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Rincon, GA, USA
Phone
7039156344
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$124,640
Expenses
$62,364
Assets
$130,087
Liabilities
$1,745

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHLEY MOORE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOYCE WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • ASHLEY MOORE (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNY WOODWARD (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Keepers of the flame foundation, inc. Is a 501(c)3 nonprofit charitable organization that supports breast cancer patients physically and emotionally.

What it reported doing in 2025

(1) uwce transportation ( grant: 1,900/ expenses: 1,900) - provided gas cards for low income breast cancer patients through a partnership with united way of the coastal empire and the women's united transportation fund. (2) care bags (grant: 4,873/expenses: 5,168) - provided chemo and mastectomy/ breast cancer support essentials (3) reframe beauty (grant: 1000/ expenses: 1,304) - adding to our gallery of local breast cancer patients of various ages, ethnicities, breast cancer diagnosis types from their empowerment photography sessions. The gallery goes on display throughout the community in october. (4) research (grant: 0/ expenses: 499)

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 28
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20.6%; rating input score 21
  • Program expense ratio: 41.1%; rating input score 41

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.09; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 65.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20.6% of revenue deployed · 41.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.