Kc Ultimate Summer League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431907401
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 7855771952
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $80,133
- Expenses
- $73,110
- Assets
- $60,502
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Clare Frantz (President)
People named in this filing
- Clare Frantz (President)
- Jordan Warren (Secretary)
- Spencer Roberts (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Kansas City Ultimate is committed to the promotion, growth and development of Ultimate in Kansas City and beyond. We organize leagues, sponsor clinics, host tournaments, and coordinate instructional, recreational, and competitive Ultimate Frisbee events. We believe in broadening the appeal and impact of Ultimate while emphasizing a commitment to sportsmanship.
What it reported doing in 2025
USAU Club Sectional Tournament host - we hosted a competitive club level postseason tournament for our section consisting of all men's, women's, and coed teams within Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, and Nebraska as teams competed for a chance to qualify for the regional tournament in Wisconsin. This included 5 teams local to the KC metro, and hosted a total of 19 teams with a player count of roughly 500. Teams played 5-6 games over 2 days and gave a showcase to the area of what competitive ultimate looked like, and allowed local players to play in front of friends and family.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.2%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 43%; rating input score 43
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.2% of revenue deployed · 43% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.