Kazakh American Alliance Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
450666662
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
6467073113
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Coalitions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,000
Expenses
$41,100
Assets
$8,900

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KARLYAGASH SARSEKEYEVA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KARLYAGASH SARSEKEYEVA (PRESIDENT)
  • AZHARA MESTLER (TREASURER)
  • GAUKHAR SARSEKEYEVA (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To increase visibility of republic of kazakhstan, it's culture and economic opportunities in the united states. Our goal is to encourage, foster and stimulate commerce, trade and business through seminars and forums for new businesses. We accomplish our mission by making community ties between kazakhstan and the USA stronger, closer and more diverse. Our organization develops, encourages and promotes mutual business opportunities for the us and kazakh companies. We serve a bridge between kazakh community residing in the us and the agencies, programs, civil society organizations and social enterpreneurship based in kazakhstan. The american companies based in the us, which are interested in exporting their products or services to kazakhstan use our expertise and contacts to answer their basic questions about the initial process and rely on our contacts for the introduction to the right agencies in kazakhstan. We also promote the exchange of students, entertainers and sport athletes to de

What it reported doing in 2013

Promotion of kazakh culture in the united states. Development and encouragment of various cultural events, exchange of entertainers and sport athletes between two countries.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 33
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.7%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 37.3%; rating input score 37

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.8%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.7% of revenue deployed · 37.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.