Kaweah Delta Hospital Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942675456
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Visalia, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5596242359
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,176,497
- Expenses
- $1,533,059
- Assets
- $26,366,282
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
37 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SARAH ASHOORI - PRESIDENT ((THRU 01/25), PAST PRESIDENT)
- REBECCA AGREDANO - VP THRU (01/25), PRESIDENT (AS OF 01/25))
- MATTHEW GRAHAM - PAST (PRESIDENT (THRU 12/24), DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- SARAH ASHOORI - PRESIDENT ((THRU 01/25), PAST PRESIDENT)
- REBECCA AGREDANO - VP THRU (01/25), PRESIDENT (AS OF 01/25))
- KATHLEEN REMILLARD - SECRETARY ((THRU 01/25), VP (AS OF 01/25))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Kaweah delta hospital foundation exists to support the needs of kaweah delta health care district through fundraising and to serve as ambassadors for the district in our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Modernization campaign - modernization 2.0 campaign (caring for our caregivers), to support those who steered us through covid, and who work hard every day to provide world-class health care. With this campaign, we will focus on creating a better working environment for our staff and physicians, as well as creating a patient memorial dedicated to those lost and the ones who healed. This memorial will give staff a safe, quiet place to reflect and restore themselves, while honoring the patients they have cared for with such compassion.in addition, the campaign will refresh the places medical staff use every day breakrooms, surgery locker rooms, and physician lounges at both the downtown and south campus sites. We know that the physical environment plays a huge role in helping our patients get better, and the same is true for our staff members. Giving them updated, useful working areas will recharge their personal batteries so they are ready for another day of saving lives and going the extra mile.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 91% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 95
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.3%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 63.3%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.2; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.3% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 33 of 33 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 37 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $159K reported
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.