Kathryn Kurka Children's Health Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954147257
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Alhambra, CA, USA
Phone
6264075469
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$113,707
Expenses
$67,405
Assets
$114,572
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAREN MAIORCA (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

People named in this filing

  • ANNETTE TAKASHIMA (DIRECTOR)
  • CANDACE ZALESKY (DIRECTOR)
  • CARMEN MONTES (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The kurka children's health fund is committed to helping students of the los angeles unified school district (lausd) be ready to learn by improving the health status of its most vulnerable children and youth.kurka children's health fund provides essential medical support to low- income and disadvantaged lausd students, ensuring access to vision and dental care, immunizations, wheelchairs, and other vital health services. Since its founding in 1956 and IRS recognition in 1987, kurka has served hundreds of thousands of students, prioritizing their well-being so theycan succeed in school.

What it reported doing in 2024

Purchased lensometers for lausd vision clinics to replace nonworking and outdated equipment, improving student eye care. Provided over 1,000 glasses frames and cases for students who also received free vision services. Covers the cost of eye exams for students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.8%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.8% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.