Kathleen Sutton Inspirational Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261344262
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Kingston, WA, USA
Phone
2063888660
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Reported finances

Revenue
$165,232
Expenses
$161,768
Assets
$207,959
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREA MANCHESTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FEB-SEPT)
  • BARBARA CARR (PRESIDENT)
  • CHERYL BLOOM (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • VALERIE ROTMARK (CLIENT ADVOCATE)
  • VIVI-ANN PARNELL (FOUNDER-NON VOTING)
  • LORI DURHAM (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The kathleen sutton fund provides reimbursement for transportation expenses to women undergoing cancer treatment who live in clallam, jefferson, kitsap, and mason counties. Covered expenses include mileage, ferry fares, parking, bridge tolls, and other transit-related costs.

What it reported doing in 2025

The fund provides transportation reimbursement to women on the kitsap and olympic peninsulas who incur expensive travel costs in conjunction with their cancer treatment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 77.6%; rating input score 78

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 77.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $126K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.