Karma Junction Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473386954
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Franklin Park, NJ, USA
Phone
7328224654
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$89,454
Expenses
$78,538
Assets
$47,047

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PRASHANT PATEL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PRASHANT PATEL (PRESIDENT)
  • MANISHA PATEL (DIRECTOR)
  • AMIT JOSHI (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Karma junction, inc. Has been organized to meet individuals basic needs of food, education, medical, housing and sanitation in country USA and india.

What it reported doing in 2025

During the 2025 tax year, the organization conducted the following program services in furtherance of its exempt purpose: 1. Basic needs and humanitarian assistance: the organization distributed essential food supplies (including food kits and staple grains), clothing (shoes and winter garments), and provided housing-related support, including minor structural repairs and installation of doors. Assistance was also extended to elderly individuals through provision of shelter, meals, and medical support. 2. Medical and health-related services: karma junction funded necessary medical care for individuals lacking financial resources, distributed mobility AIDS such as wheelchairs, and provided sanitary hygiene products to promote health and well-being. 3. Educational support: the organization supported access to education by subsidizing school fees, facilitating internet access, and distributing educational materials, including books, notebooks, school bags, chalkboards, and classroom benches. 4. Water and infrastructure development: karma junction financed and facilitated the construction of water wells in areas lacking access to clean drinking water, thereby improving public health and reducing resource burden on local communities. 5. Livelihood and economic empowerment: the organization provided income-generating assets, including tricycles, sewing machines, and bicycles, to enable beneficiaries to establish or sustain self-employment activities. 6. Community development: the organization supplied shared-use assets, including a television, to support community access to information and educational content. All program services were funded through charitable contributions and implemented with volunteer support. The organizations activities were designed to deliver direct relief and sustainable support to economically disadvantaged individuals and communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 96.8%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.2%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85% of revenue deployed · 96.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.