Kappa Delta Pi Educational Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351489742
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3178714900
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MARY CATHERINE CLEMENT (PAST PRESIDENT)
- DR ELIZABETH WILKINS (PRESIDENT)
- DR PEGGY MOCH (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- DR SUSANNAH BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DR DENISHA JONES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- THETA FAYE SNOGRESS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- THETA FAYE SNOGRESS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $98,531 total reported compensation
- PATRICIA BONTEMPTO (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $58,664 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
An educational foundation that promotes, recognizes, and rewards academic excellence in the field of education by receiving contributions and awarding scholarships and grants.
What it reported doing in 2014
No program activity - the foundation dissolved during the fiscal year 2015.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: NotEnoughData
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -42.5% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -37.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $99K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.