Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity Northeastern Province
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232037777
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Manchester, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8602683816
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $404,145
- Expenses
- $363,254
- Assets
- $1,265,119
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
People named in this filing
- Theodore Sanchious (Province Polemarch)
- Pierre Oscar (Sr Province Vice Polemarch)
- Keanan Andrews (Junior Province Vice Polemarch)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Consistent with the Grand Chapter of Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity Inc., the Northeastern Province's objectives are as follows: 1. To unite college men of culture, patriotism, and honor in a bond of fraternity. 2. To encourage honorable achievement in every field of human endeavor. 3. To promote the spiritual, social, intellectual, and moral welfare of members. 4. To assist the aims and purposes of colleges and universities. 5. To inspire service in the public interest.
What it reported doing in 2024
Membership meetings that include the Grand Chapter Meeting, Province Council, C. Rodger Wilson Leadership conference for undergraduate students, and Board of Director meetings to discuss governance affairs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.1%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.48; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $310K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 25 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.