Kansas Motor Carriers Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
480289750
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Topeka, KS, USA
Phone
7852671641
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$557,702
Expenses
$662,009
Assets
$530,871
Liabilities
$69,729

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMIE BRADLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • LAURA HOPKINS (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ALAN BOROVETZ (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BRETT WEIS (ATA STATE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JASON HAMMES (ATA ALTERNATE STATE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DEANN WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THRU 11/24))

Highest reported compensation

  • DEANN WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THRU 11/24)): $110,308 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Chartered by the state of Kansas as a non-profit corporation on august 11, 1936, the Kansas motor carriers association through the intervening years consistently has provided the progressive, organized leadership that has helped the highway transportation industry improve its services to the public and to achieve its present stature.with its membership of more than 1,200 companies - consisting of representatives of all types of motor carrier operations and allied enterprises - kmca is able to speak with authority as the voice of the highway transportation industry. In all its deliberations and in all of its policies, the protection and the promotion of the public interest remains a paramount objective of kmca.the highway transportation industry, and the Kansas motor carriers association, subscribe to the conviction that when the interest of the public is served, the interests of the members of this association are served.

What it reported doing in 2024

Public education - promote positive image of the industry by making presentations to school children

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 27 of 27 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 28 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.