Kansas Junior High School Rodeo
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030574895
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Kingman, KS, USA
- Phone
- 6205323113
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Equestrian
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,693
- Expenses
- $108,244
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The main purpose of the Kansas junior high school rodeo association is to develop character, self-esteem and personal skill to enable members to become responsible adults. The kjhsra does this through the sport or rodeo. We believe the sport of rodeo provides numerous life skill opportunities for our members while competing in individual rodeo events for prizes and yearly points. Rodeos are put together by volunteer committees that work to continue the sport and provide events for members to compete. Members are required to be enrolled in the 6th, 7th and 8th grade. They must be passing at least 4 courses and have signed forms from school faculty that they have met the academic requirements and are good citizens at their schools.
What it reported doing in 2010
We teach responsibility and good sportsmanship thru rodeo. We had 60 members and produced 12 rodeos.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.