Kansas Interscholastic Athletic Administrators Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263362778
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Pratt, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3169737257
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $161,121
- Expenses
- $121,359
- Assets
- $64,891
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREG ROSENHAGEN (PAST PRESIDENT CHAIRMAN)
- SHANE BACKUS (PRESIDENT)
- JAY GIFFORD (PAST EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BRENT BECHARD (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS ASMUSSEN (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GREG ROSENHAGEN (PAST PRESIDENT CHAIRMAN)
- SHANE BACKUS (PRESIDENT)
- JAY GIFFORD (PAST EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide support & education to athletic administrators across the state of Kansas.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Kansas interscholastic athletic administrators association (kiaaa) holds a conference each year during the month of march. The conference is conducted by the kiaaa board of directors and member volunteers. The conference offers many activities for athletic administrators which include speakers, presentations, raffle, golfing, and family events. The conference is generally held over a three-day period. The conference features speakers and presentations to help athletic administrators of Kansas schools learn and grow in their profession. The conference provides an opportunity for athletic administrators across the state of Kansas to discuss ideas and concerns regarding the administration of athletics in Kansas schools.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.7%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.