Kansas City Clinical Oncology Program

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431778437
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Prairie Village, KS, USA
Phone
9139485588
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Cancer Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$110,414
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LESLIE HERST (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • LESLIE HERST (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote and contribute to the public welfare by advancement of medicine, including, but not limited to promoting research in cancer treatment and prevention.

What it reported doing in 2022

Nci community oncology research program - Kansas city was a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization whose mission is to support and coordinate community participation in national cancer institute (nci) sponsored clinical trials. The program competed for continued funding for the period of august 1, 2019 - july 31, 2025 in response to rfa-ca-18-016 but was not selected for continued funding. Given this fact, the program ceased the enrollment of new patients onto clinical trials, and none were enrolled during the period of august 1, 2020 - july 31, 2021. The program remained open to continue the conduct of follow up only on previously enrolled patients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 1
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 71.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -133.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.