Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481102008
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Salina, KS, USA
- Phone
- 7858233343
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Quality, Protection, and Beautification N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,534,151
- Expenses
- $18,241,172
- Assets
- $3,801,918
- Liabilities
- $972,924
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KARI MAILLOUX (PRESIDENT)
- CORNELIA STEVENS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTI SMITH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- TANYA KOEHN (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- TANYA KOEHN (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $123,978 total reported compensation
- CHRISTI SMITH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $50,392 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Out vision is: all communities across Kansas value and support a high-quality early childhood care and education system.
What it reported doing in 2024
1. Expenses $1,853,481 including grants of $668,094 revenue $1,964,417child care health consultant (cchc) network. Funding for this program began on 9-1-2020 and ended 6-30-2024. From january 1, 2022, to june 30, 2024, the child care health consultant (cchc) network awarded 1,297 grants to child care providers across Kansas. This included 1,047 start-up stipends, and 250 health and safety grants. These grant opportunities supported new and existing programs in establishing or maintaining safe, high-quality environments for children.during the project period, the cchc network engaged 5,597 potentially new and licensed child care providers through non-consultation methods, resulting in a total of 25,405 engagements. Additionally, 260 providers participated in the new provider engagement and technical support (nets) initiative, accounting for 670 engagements, while 1,258 additional engagements included grants as a core activity.a total of 7,102 consultations were completed with 1,839 potentially new and licensed providers. Among them, 1,065 received more than one consultation, and 1,067 consultations were directly related to grant support. Notably, one program received 64 consultations over two years, from march 2022 to may 2024the highest number recorded within the network. This sustained, individualized support highlights the cchc network's commitment to meeting the diverse and evolving needs of Kansas child care providers.2. Expenses $501,550 including grants of $474,029 revenue $502,792baby steps, preschool development grant, is an innovative pilot that seeks not only to offset the revenue lost by caring for infants and toddlers, but also to bring family child care providers' income up, due to loss of wages when the provider enrolls infants. Participating child care programs receive support from Kansas' infant toddler specialist network and services aimed at improving the quality of care for young children, and increase the likelihood that a child care provider will accept one or more infants. The baby steps pilot project is currently serving 44 family child care programs, and providing access to care to 45 infants in 4 Kansas counties within the Kansas city metro area. In 2024, baby steps made payments to child care providers to help offset the loss of income Kansas providers face.3. Expenses $217,406 including grants of $163,900 revenue $225,898dcf enrolled child care provider incentive payments (funded by american rescue plan act (arpa) of 2021 through Kansas department for children and families) financial assistance to dcf enrolled child care providers based on the findings of the difference from current subsidy rates to the increased subsidy rates from the narrow cost analysis completed by prenatal to five fiscal strategies in july 2022. These funds are also intended to help offset the cost of enrolling with dcf as a provider who can accept child care assistance for newly enrolled providers. 85 providers received payments in 2024. 4. Expenses $42,713 including grants of $0 revenue $45,896accounting services for Kansas parents as teachers association (kpata) on october 1, 2019, kaccrra entered into an agreement with kpata to provide accounting services.5. Expenses $213,127 including grants of $187,000 revenue $252,612arpa start young wage bonuses are offered in partnership with the family conservancy for child care providers in wyandotte county. The overall goal is to create a systemic approach to early childhood education that will improve the access and quality of child care, in wyandotte county and beyond. Bonuses are given out 4 times over 2-years to child care workers employed for at least one month to incentivize employee retention.6. Expenses $77,140 including grants of $0 revenue $87,096child care go team was initiated in 2022 in an agreement with university of Kansas center for public partnerships and research. The child care go team consists of representatives from Kansas department of health and environment, ka
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 59% for direct work, and 41% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $291.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 99; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $17.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 14 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.8M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 72 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 70 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.