Kansas Association of Agricultural Educators
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260552637
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Cuba, KS, USA
- Phone
- 7853241097
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,378
- Expenses
- $112,947
- Assets
- $116,122
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ASHLEY KLOZENBUCHER (SOUTH WEST VICE PRESIDENT)
- JANET GOTTSTINE (NORTH WEST VICE PRESIDENT)
- KASIE BOGART (PAST PRESIDENT)
- LAURA MILLER (PRESIDENT)
- MARY BETH FULK (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- MATTHEW ANGUIANO (NORTH EAST VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ARIKA HARESNAPE (EAST CENTRAL VICE PRESIDEN)
- ASHLEY KLOZENBUCHER (SOUTH WEST VICE PRESIDENT)
- CARMELITA GOOSSEN (EXECUTIVE SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Professional development of agricultural educators
What it reported doing in 2024
Host two large professional conferences annually
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 59.7%; rating input score 60
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63% of revenue deployed · 59.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $67K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.