Kane Fish & Game Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251621235
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Kane, PA, USA
Phone
8148378972
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$68,228
Expenses
$70,988
Assets
$286,660
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GERALD OAKES (PRESIDENT)
  • EDWARD SLEEMAN (V. PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GERALD OAKES (PRESIDENT)
  • HAROLD MADER (TREASURER)
  • STEVE TIMPANO (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose for which this corporation was formed shall be as follows: to increase and preserve the natural water supply, forests, fish, game and birds, and to educate people to a proper appreciation of these objects and to engage in, sponsor and promote, not for profit, recreational activities and programs solely for the enjoyment and use of the said corporation and to build and continue the spirit of good sportsmenship and betterment of surrounding wildlife in the commonwealth; also, to take title to real and personal property to be used in furtherance of the foregoing objects and purposes.

What it reported doing in 2024

Trap and sporting clays shotgun shooting competition was performed in four different leagues during the spring, summer, fall and winter of 2022. The spring adult elk county trap league included approximately 25 shooters and the high school scholastic team included 30 shooters. Winter sporting clays shot about 20 shooters and winter trap in warren county league included about 18 shooters. Cost of shells and targets for the trap and sporting clays shooting totalled $16,284 for the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.04; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.