Kane Area Community Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251826255
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Kane, PA, USA
Phone
8148379472
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$155,307
Expenses
$152,453
Assets
$190,665
Liabilities
$1,600

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Patty Kunicki (President)
  • Alan Asp (Vice President)
  • Michelle Palmer (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Patty Kunicki (President)
  • Alan Asp (Vice President)
  • Laura Rhodes (Secretary/Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide facilities for people of all ages from the Kane Community and surrounding areas to gather and encourage opportunities such as recreation, education, socialization, art, science and culture.

What it reported doing in 2025

Kane Kids - an after school & summer club for students in 3rd grade and up. They provide homework help, snacks, games, computer time and recreation and special guest visitors. Runs all year at no charge to any student.Computer Lab - offers the use of its computer lab free of charge to anyone during business hours.Community dinners - offers free dinners every Tuesday and Thursday during the school year and free lunches during summer programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 34.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.