Kanab Animal Assistance Program
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 992108711
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Kanab, UT, USA
- Phone
- 4356160571
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Veterinary Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,467
- Expenses
- $16,015
- Assets
- $26,656
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- WENDY STANFORD (DIRECTOR OF)
- DR TARA TIMPSON (DIRECTOR)
- DR PATTI PATTERSON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide affordable veterinary services to financially disadvantaged individuals and families in our local community. Grants for emergency or urgent care grants for healthy safeguards for community animals grants for high quality low cost spay/neuter
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide grants for emergency or urgent veterinary care that ensures animals remain in loving homes during medical and financial crisis. Includes emergency services for hit by car and attack by another animal.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.7%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.4%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 91.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 76.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 92.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.7% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.